Head to head
MCP vs UsageMax public observability
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read-only MCP for AI usage profiles, leaderboards, stats, and docs; no writes or private data.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 91). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | UsageMax public observability | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |