Head to head
MCP vs Breaking Changes & Migration Data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listingBreaking Changes & Migration Data
Cio.github.nigelcox98/breaking-changesNo reviews yet
What breaks when you upgrade a package, and what to use instead - from official docs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 67). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Breaking Changes & Migration Data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 73 | – |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |