Head to head
MCP vs web3ctx
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listingweb3ctx
Aio.github.FarseenSh/web3ctxNo reviews yet
Version-true web3 docs, ABIs and human-validated integration recipes over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 91). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | web3ctx | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 73 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |