Head to head
MCP vs Penny Search
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Manage Appwrite projects, databases, auth, storage, functions, and messaging; search Appwrite docs
Full listingNo reviews yet
Low-cost live web search for current facts, news, research, docs, and web grounding via x402.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 67). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Penny Search | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 73 | – |
| Downloads / week | 24k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |