Head to head
Warn vs Litescrape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search 61,330+ US WARN Act layoff notices: 48 states, back to 1988, rebuilt daily. No API key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Litescrape (92/100 against 78). Litescrape is hosted and callable through the gateway; Warn runs on your own machine.
| Warn | Litescrape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B78/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 74 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |