Head to head
MCP vs Lead Enrichment
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Official Apollo.io MCP server for lead enrichment, prospecting, sequences, and analytics.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Lead enrichment for AI agents: email finder, company enrichment, people data, firmographics.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 98 out of 100). Lead Enrichment is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine.
| MCP | Lead Enrichment | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 25 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 23 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |