Head to head
MCP Server vs Intakra Public Signal Review
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
天启至数 ApocData - MCP Server for A-share market data (46 free, no-auth endpoints)
Full listing
No reviews yet
Score supplied buying-signal evidence and prepare review-only why-now briefs. Read-only, no auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (91/100 against 69). Intakra Public Signal Review is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | Intakra Public Signal Review | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 89 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |