Head to head
MCP Server vs Fastapi Auth Token JWT Service
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
天启至数 ApocData - MCP Server for A-share market data (46 free, no-auth endpoints)
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (91/100 against 62). Fastapi Auth Token JWT Service is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | Fastapi Auth Token JWT Service | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C62/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 89 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-11 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |