Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent Mandate Verification vs Accessibility Statement Lint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent Mandate Verificationio.github.API-Disk-Integrations/agent-mandate
B
No reviews yet

Verify a proposed action against a signed Agent Mandate without executing or mutating accounts.

Full listing
Accessibility Statement Lintio.github.jmshinhwa/accessibility-statement-lint
A
No reviews yet

Checks the accessibility statement you already published against the EU model statement and its two

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 89 out of 100). Agent Mandate Verification has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent Mandate VerificationAccessibility Statement Lint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB82/100A89/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars00
Downloads / week360–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools1—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-162026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agent Mandate Verification vs agent-deviceAgent Mandate Verification vs MCPAgent Mandate Verification vs IWEAgent Mandate Verification vs Agent-Native ChatAgent Mandate Verification vs Actual Budget MCP ServerAll AI and agents servers