Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL vs Run402

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQLio.github.antonorlov/mcp-postgres-server
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.

Full listing
Run402com.run402/mcp
B
No reviews yet

x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 84 out of 100). Run402 is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL runs on your own machine.

 PostgreSQLRun402
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B84/100
AdoptionEstablishedEstablished
GitHub stars2224
Downloads / week2.9k3.5k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools64
Write actions11
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-162026-09-23
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL vs NeonPostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)PostgreSQL vs Postgres AIopsPostgreSQL vs SupabaseAll Databases servers