Head to head
PostgreSQL vs pgtriage
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.
Full listingpgtriage
Cio.github.pgtriage/pgtriageNo reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL performance auditing with actionable SQL fixes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PostgreSQL (83/100 against 65). PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL | pgtriage | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 22 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.9k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 6 | 5 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |