Head to head
PostgreSQL vs NexQL Postgres MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Standalone Postgres MCP server — schema-aware, read-only by default, installable everywhere.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 82 out of 100). PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL | NexQL Postgres MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 2.9k | 53 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |