Head to head
PostgreSQL vs Memory MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.
Full listingMemory MCP Server
?io.github.j0hanz/memory-mcpNo reviews yet
SQLite-backed MCP server for persistent memory, full-text retrieval, and graph traversal.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL | Memory MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | ? |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 22 | – |
| Downloads / week | 2.9k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |