Mmcp.market

Head to head

SEO Tools: Google Search Console vs Attaché

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SEO Tools: Google Search Consoleio.github.antohins/seo-tools-mcp-gsc
B
No reviews yet

Google Search Console: Search Analytics, URL Inspection, sitemaps (read-only, OAuth/service acct).

Full listing
Attachéstudio.attache/attache
B
No reviews yet

GA4, Google Ads and Search Console in Claude. Read-only OAuth, multi-account for agencies.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SEO Tools: Google Search Console (83/100 against 70). Attaché is hosted and callable through the gateway; SEO Tools: Google Search Console runs on your own machine. SEO Tools: Google Search Console has noticeably more public adoption.

 SEO Tools: Google Search ConsoleAttaché
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B70/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars3–
Downloads / week61–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools6—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-18—
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

SEO Tools: Google Search Console vs Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCPSEO Tools: Google Search Console vs Search Console MCPSEO Tools: Google Search Console vs Google Search ConsoleSEO Tools: Google Search Console vs Google Search ConsoleSEO Tools: Google Search Console vs Google Search ConsoleAll SEO servers