Mmcp.market

Head to head

SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs Autorank

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeio.github.antohins/seo-tools-mcp-aparser
B
No reviews yet

Bridge to a self-hosted A-Parser: SERP, suggests and 150+ parsers via its API (read-only).

Full listing
Autorankio.github.RyanKramer/autorank-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Technical SEO tools for AI agents: structured data, meta tags, robots, SERP truncation. No API key.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Autorank (92/100 against 83). SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge has noticeably more public adoption.

 SEO Tools: A-Parser bridgeAutorank
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars30
Downloads / week35–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools1118
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-08-27
CategorySEOSEO

Other comparisons

SEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs GoAnyAPI MCPSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs SEO DataSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs GlasserSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs NanoToolsSEO Tools: A-Parser bridge vs MotiBlogAll SEO servers