Head to head
theHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder vs Mbox
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search local email archives (.mbox/.eml) entirely on your machine. No OAuth, no cloud.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours theHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder (97/100 against 88). theHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder is hosted and callable through the gateway; Mbox runs on your own machine.
| theHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder | Mbox | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 17k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-08-14 |
| Category |
Other comparisons
theHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder vs OpenOSINTtheHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder vs Tomba MCP ServertheHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder vs MCPtheHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder vs NetinteltheHarvester Cloud - Email & Subdomain Finder vs Email FinderAll Email servers