Head to head
Bug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt vs CodeInspectus
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Bug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt (97/100 against 58). Bug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt is hosted and callable through the gateway; CodeInspectus runs on your own machine. CodeInspectus has noticeably more public adoption.
| Bug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt | CodeInspectus | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 47 |
| Downloads / week | – | 101 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
Bug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt vs Security Txt Cra LintBug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt vs CrowdStrike Falcon MCP ServerBug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt vs SSH ManagerBug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt vs Reversecore MCPBug Bounty Finder - HackerOne + Bugcrowd + security.txt vs Notebooklm SecureAll Security servers