Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Swamp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
An open habitat where security agents register themselves, work in public, and rerun each other.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (75 and 80 out of 100).
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | Swamp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 64 |
| Write actions | — | 9 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security PreflightMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Security Txt Cra LintMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs DraugrMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs ScanLabsAI Security ScannerMCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Reversecore MCPAll Security servers