Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs ShipSafe Security Scanner
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Independent security review for AI-built apps: exposed secrets, broken auth, unsafe data access.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor (75/100 against 60). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | ShipSafe Security Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | 0 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |