Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs Tokenectomy Razor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Autonomous log surgery & secret redaction MCP server for AI coding agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tokenectomy Razor (90/100 against 75). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tokenectomy Razor runs on your own machine.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | Tokenectomy Razor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |