Head to head
Search vs Exa
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Search
Cio.github.Anon2052/search-mcpNo reviews yet
Web search and clean-text fetch MCP server (Tavily-powered, SSRF-guarded).
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Exa (88/100 against 67). Exa has noticeably more public adoption.
| Search | Exa | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 5.0k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 2 | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |