Head to head
Failure Lab vs Ceraph
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
A chaos-engineering and resilience-testing toolkit for Model Context Protocol servers.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server for agent-driven React Native and Expo development and mobile testing
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Failure Lab (92/100 against 74).
| Failure Lab | Ceraph | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 211 | 656 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-28 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |