Head to head
GrayMatter vs Common Agent Network
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent agent memory as a single Go binary: knowledge graph, TUI observability, zero infra.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Public coordination, knowledge, discovery, and feature requests for autonomous agents and swarms.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Common Agent Network (81/100 against 70). Common Agent Network is hosted and callable through the gateway; GrayMatter runs on your own machine. GrayMatter has noticeably more public adoption.
| GrayMatter | Common Agent Network | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-08 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |