Head to head
GrayMatter vs Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent agent memory as a single Go binary: knowledge graph, TUI observability, zero infra.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Observability MCP server: query LLM cost/errors/latency & operate alerts/evals from Claude/Cursor
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Server (82/100 against 70). GrayMatter has noticeably more public adoption.
| GrayMatter | Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 471 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 149 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 89 |
| Write actions | — | 32 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |