Head to head
toolweave vs Lm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
One MCP endpoint for Claude, GPT & Gemini: 100+ tools + no-code connectors + agent workers.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect Claude to any OpenAI-compatible LLM endpoint and offload routine work to a local model.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lm (85/100 against 67). toolweave is hosted and callable through the gateway; Lm runs on your own machine. Lm has noticeably more public adoption.
| toolweave | Lm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 119 |
| Downloads / week | – | 122 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |