Mmcp.market

Head to head

nodriver — undetected browser automation vs Tap

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

nodriver — undetected browser automationio.github.andresolbach/nodriver-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Undetected anti-bot Chrome automation. 65 tools, parallel isolated browsers.

Full listing
Tapio.github.LeonTing1010/tap
B
No reviews yet

Browser MCP for logged-in tasks. Uses your Chrome — credentials stay local. Zero-token replay.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours nodriver — undetected browser automation (92/100 against 75). Tap is hosted and callable through the gateway; nodriver — undetected browser automation runs on your own machine.

 nodriver — undetected browser automationTap
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B75/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars418
Downloads / week69106
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools1—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-08-252026-08-09
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

nodriver — undetected browser automation vs MCP Browsernodriver — undetected browser automation vs Safarinodriver — undetected browser automation vs Agent360 Browser MCPnodriver — undetected browser automation vs Oya Browsernodriver — undetected browser automation vs PyreCrawlAll Scraping and browsing servers