Head to head
Cursor Delegate vs Tessryx
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Your agent builds websites, APIs, automations and admin tools; Tessryx hosts them on your domain.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cursor Delegate (92/100 against 70). Tessryx is hosted and callable through the gateway; Cursor Delegate runs on your own machine. Cursor Delegate has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cursor Delegate | Tessryx | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 4 | – |
| Downloads / week | 123 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |