Head to head
Documentation vs Repomix
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pack local or remote codebases into AI-friendly files that LLMs and coding agents can read or search
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100). Repomix has noticeably more public adoption.
| Documentation | Repomix | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 344 | 28k |
| Downloads / week | 96 | 67k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-27 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |