Head to head
Anahana Content MCP vs mcp-local-rag
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Wellness, spiritual-growth and angel-number articles in 24 languages, plus agent-wellbeing guides.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 65). Anahana Content MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-local-rag runs on your own machine. mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.
| Anahana Content MCP | mcp-local-rag | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 399 |
| Downloads / week | – | 4.7k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |