Mmcp.market

Head to head

Anaconda MCP vs Rede

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Anaconda MCPio.github.anaconda/anaconda-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Beta conda env/package MCP server; requires conda, auth, and Beta Terms.

Full listing
Redeio.github.codespar/mcp-rede
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for Rede — Itaú-owned BR acquirer: authorize/capture/refund, zero-auth, card tokens

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Anaconda MCP (90/100 against 82). Rede has noticeably more public adoption.

 Anaconda MCPRede
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA90/100B82/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars4271
Downloads / week–25
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—22
Write actions—7
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceBSD-3-ClauseMIT
Last release2026-09-152026-08-29
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Anaconda MCP vs spintax.net MCP serverAnaconda MCP vs npm Registry MCP ServerAnaconda MCP vs Healthclaw GuardrailsAnaconda MCP vs pkgxrayAnaconda MCP vs BackgenAll Security servers