Head to head
ClickHouse vs PostgreSQL
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only MCP server for ClickHouse metadata, parameterized queries, and plan analysis.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 83 out of 100). PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.
| ClickHouse | PostgreSQL | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 22 |
| Downloads / week | 146 | 2.9k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 4 | 6 |
| Write actions | 2 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |