Head to head
Human Standards vs Open Ephemeris
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only Human Standards guidance for accessible, usable interface design.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Sub-arcsecond astrology on NASA JPL DE440: natal, transits, Human Design, Vedic, BaZi.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 98 out of 100). Open Ephemeris is hosted and callable through the gateway; Human Standards runs on your own machine.
| Human Standards | Open Ephemeris | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 27 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Media | Media |