Head to head
World Resolver vs Tinysearch
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
World Resolver
Cio.github.ajithisaac/world-resolverNo reviews yet
Resolve real-world capability gaps: validate native MCPs, search the web, and record unmet demand.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tinysearch (82/100 against 57). World Resolver is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tinysearch runs on your own machine. Tinysearch has noticeably more public adoption.
| World Resolver | Tinysearch | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 229 |
| Downloads / week | – | 84 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |