Head to head
Myc vs RE-call MCP Memory Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Myc
Cio.github.aistastudio/mycNo reviews yet
Task queue, decisions and memory for coding agents. Local SQLite, no network. Requires Bun.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Agent memory on your own Postgres that flags superseded facts and abstains instead of guessing.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours RE-call MCP Memory Server (80/100 against 66). Myc has noticeably more public adoption.
| Myc | RE-call MCP Memory Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 12 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 1.1k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 13 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |