Mmcp.market

Head to head

Queue AIops vs Supabase

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Queue AIopsio.github.AIops-tools/queue-aiops
A
No reviews yet

Governed redis + rabbitmq ops: memory/latency/backlog/churn RCA, policies. 28 tools.

Full listing
Supabasecom.supabase/mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Supabase (100/100 against 91). Supabase is hosted and callable through the gateway; Queue AIops runs on your own machine. Supabase has noticeably more public adoption.

 Queue AIopsSupabase
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100A100/100
AdoptionNewWidely used
GitHub stars02.9k
Downloads / week–76k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-162026-09-18
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

Queue AIops vs MCP Toolbox for DatabasesQueue AIops vs GeoLensQueue AIops vs NeonQueue AIops vs Magic CloudQueue AIops vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers