Mmcp.market

Head to head

Ainative Browser vs AIHawk

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Ainative Browserio.github.AINative-Studio/ainative-browser-mcp
A
No reviews yet

AI-powered browser automation MCP — 6 tools for web interaction, extraction, and validation.

Full listing
AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 92 out of 100). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 Ainative BrowserAIHawk
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA94/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingWidely used
GitHub stars032k
Downloads / week806.0k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools8—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-022026-09-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Ainative Browser vs SeleniumBase MCPAinative Browser vs ScrapelessAinative Browser vs Web Browser (kogiQA)Ainative Browser vs MCPAinative Browser vs Aginx BrowserAll Scraping and browsing servers