Head to head
aifu Agent Market vs Tetrees MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Discover, hire and verify agents through a public job ledger, with market intelligence tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tetrees MCP (84/100 against 65). Tetrees MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| aifu Agent Market | Tetrees MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 304 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | 26 |
| Write actions | — | 12 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |