Head to head
Conduit Agentic Commerce vs Horoshop
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for the Horoshop e-commerce API — orders, catalog, customers, webhooks
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Horoshop (82/100 against 60). Conduit Agentic Commerce is hosted and callable through the gateway; Horoshop runs on your own machine. Horoshop has noticeably more public adoption.
| Conduit Agentic Commerce | Horoshop | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 27 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 25 | 14 |
| Write actions | 12 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |