Head to head
AI2SQL vs PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate, fix, explain and run read-only SQL on PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server
Full listingPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Cio.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardenedNo reviews yet
Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (70 and 68 out of 100). AI2SQL is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) has noticeably more public adoption.
| AI2SQL | PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 91 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |