Head to head
Buoy vs Kiln
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Design tokens and drift checks for coding agents: use the token, not the hardcoded value.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Kiln MCP server for agents: design, slice, print, monitor, and recover physical objects safely.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Buoy (91/100 against 72).
| Buoy | Kiln | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B72/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 19 | 67 |
| Downloads / week | 1.3k | 169 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 100 |
| Write actions | — | 8 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | Media | Media |