Head to head
Aginx Browser vs Browser Automation
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Stealth web browser for agents: search, fetch, click, download and type in persistent MCP sessions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Browser automation MCP server: navigate, fill forms, click, screenshot, and manage tabs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Browser Automation (94/100 against 73). Aginx Browser is hosted and callable through the gateway; Browser Automation runs on your own machine.
| Aginx Browser | Browser Automation | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 12 |
| Downloads / week | – | 163 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 21 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |