Mmcp.market

Head to head

Aginx Browser vs Weboperator

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Aginx Browsernet.aginx/aginxbrowser
B
No reviews yet

Stealth web browser for agents: search, fetch, click, download and type in persistent MCP sessions.

Full listing
Weboperatorio.github.KazKozDev/weboperator
B
No reviews yet

Hands your live Chrome tab to any MCP client — snapshot, navigate, click, type, extract.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Weboperator (83/100 against 73). Aginx Browser is hosted and callable through the gateway; Weboperator runs on your own machine.

 Aginx BrowserWeboperator
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB73/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars303
Downloads / week–32
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—10
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-14
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Aginx Browser vs AIHawkAginx Browser vs Openbrowser AIAginx Browser vs Oya BrowserAginx Browser vs acrawlAginx Browser vs SeleniumBase MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers