Head to head
Aginx Browser vs Feedthrough
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Stealth web browser for agents: search, fetch, click, download and type in persistent MCP sessions.
Full listingFeedthrough
Aio.github.feedthrough/feedthroughNo reviews yet
Debug bridge inside your web app: an agent reads the DOM, console and network. Any browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Feedthrough (91/100 against 73). Aginx Browser is hosted and callable through the gateway; Feedthrough runs on your own machine.
| Aginx Browser | Feedthrough | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 30 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 62 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 16 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-04 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |