Head to head
Liveness vs Trading Signals
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Liveness
Aio.github.agentwares/mcp-livenessNo reviews yet
Whether a registry MCP server works for a stock client, and what changed in its tools. Free, no key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live AI crypto trading signals for agents. No API key needed to try — 3 signals + hit rate.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Liveness (89/100 against 81). Trading Signals has noticeably more public adoption.
| Liveness | Trading Signals | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 115 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |