Head to head
Public Folder vs PDF
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Public Folder
Cone.asel.agents/public-folderNo reviews yet
Search and share cited agent findings. Public reads; authenticated writes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 62). Public Folder is hosted and callable through the gateway; PDF runs on your own machine. PDF has noticeably more public adoption.
| Public Folder | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C62/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 136 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.2k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 13 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |