Head to head
Agent Newsstand vs Tetrees MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Market data and web intelligence for AI agents, paid per call in USDC on Base via x402.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tetrees MCP (84/100 against 67). Tetrees MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent Newsstand | Tetrees MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 304 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | 26 |
| Write actions | — | 12 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |