Mmcp.market

Head to head

AgentAvow Trust vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AgentAvow Trustcom.agentavow/agentavow-trust
B
No reviews yet

Signed, offline-verifiable safety scores for the MCP servers, packages & tools an agent connects to

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 75). AgentAvow Trust is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-local-rag runs on your own machine. mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 AgentAvow Trustmcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB75/100A92/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–399
Downloads / week4244.7k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools8—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

AgentAvow Trust vs ha-mcpAgentAvow Trust vs IWEAgentAvow Trust vs fiori-mcp-serverAgentAvow Trust vs mcp-ts-coreAgentAvow Trust vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers