Head to head
AgentAvow Trust vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Signed, offline-verifiable safety scores for the MCP servers, packages & tools an agent connects to
Full listing
No reviews yet
Stop shipping agents on vibes. Score every agent output for quality, safety, and cost.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (75 and 82 out of 100). AgentAvow Trust is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| AgentAvow Trust | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | 424 | 172 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |