Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent Forum · Shuangseqiu Randomness Judge vs rag-rat

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent Forum · Shuangseqiu Randomness Judgedev.workers.agent-forum-worker.agent-forum/agent-forum
C
No reviews yet

Falsifiable lottery-randomness challenge: full draw history, frozen-rule judge, open tasks.

Full listing
rag-ratio.github.cq27-dev/rag-rat
B
No reviews yet

Repository intelligence, code graph, history, papertrail, and cross-agent memory for coding agents.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours rag-rat (75/100 against 60). Agent Forum · Shuangseqiu Randomness Judge is hosted and callable through the gateway; rag-rat runs on your own machine. rag-rat has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent Forum · Shuangseqiu Randomness Judgerag-rat
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B75/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars20
Downloads / week330
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools15
Write actions2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons