Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent Verification Utility vs three.ws Portfolio

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent Verification Utilitydev.kgninja.agent-economy/agent-verification-utility
C
No reviews yet

Deterministic JSON checks with signed evidence and x402-paid execution

Full listing
three.ws Portfolioio.github.nirholas/portfolio-mcp
B
No reviews yet

An agent's trading state — portfolio value, PnL, live balances, trade feed, and signed transfers.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Portfolio (83/100 against 60). Agent Verification Utility is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Portfolio runs on your own machine. three.ws Portfolio has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent Verification Utilitythree.ws Portfolio
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–206
Downloads / week–34
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools5—
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—Apache-2.0
Last release—2026-09-22
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agent Verification Utility vs LeClapAgent Verification Utility vs MCPAgent Verification Utility vs Emilia ProtocolAgent Verification Utility vs three.ws ProvenanceAgent Verification Utility vs HOL GuardAll AI and agents servers